Skip to content
  • Confiscation & Proceeds of Crime
  • Resources
Menu
  • Confiscation & Proceeds of Crime
  • Resources
  • News & Media
  • About
  • Contact
Menu
  • News & Media
  • About
  • Contact
  • Confiscation & Proceeds of Crime
  • Resources
  • About
  • News & Media
  • Contact
Menu
  • Confiscation & Proceeds of Crime
  • Resources
  • About
  • News & Media
  • Contact

News & Media

Filter by Category
  • All Articles
  • Key Concepts
    • Proceeds
    • Instrument
    • Effective Control
    • Interest in Property
  • Restraining Orders
    • Ex Parte Determination
    • Evidentiary Requirements for Suspicion
    • Undertaking as to Damages
    • Reasons for Restraining Order
    • Right to Inter Partes Re-Hearing
  • Revocation Applications
  • Variation of Restraining Orders
  • Exclusion and Compensation Orders
    • Onus Of Proof and Evidentiary Burden
    • Exclusion Orders
    • Compensation Orders
    • Common Issues
      • Fraudulent Loan Applications
  • Pecuniary Penalty Orders
  • Information Gathering
    • Examinations
      • Ex Parte Application for Examination Order
      • Quarantining Orders
      • Compelling Attendance at Examination
    • Production Orders
  • Stay of Proceedings Pending Finalisation of Criminal Proceedings
  • Miscellaneous
    • Costs
    • Time Limits and Extensions of Time
      • Date of Conviction
      • Extensions of Time
    • Public Interest
    • Constitutional Validity
  • Confiscation Act 1997
    • In Any Way Involved
    • Discretionary Forfeiture and Hardship
    • Sentencing and Forfeiture
    • Compensation Under Sentencing Act 1991 (VIC)
    • Deemed Conviction After Death
    • Cannabis Wet or Dry Weight
    • Date of Conviction
    • Inter Partes Re-hearing
    • Serious Drug Offence Restraining Orders

South Australian Supreme Court determines that property is “proceeds” of the offence of murder

Christian Juebner February 18, 2023

High Court decides cuckoo-smurfing appeals

Christian Juebner November 24, 2019

DPP v Richardson – forfeiture application in sex cases

Christian Juebner June 21, 2019

AFP v Arora – Cuckoo Smurfing

Christian Juebner February 21, 2019

AFP v Hart (High Court)

Christian Juebner February 8, 2018

Cini v AFP: property at which drugs stored was used in or connection with possession of drugs (22 September 2016)

Christian Juebner September 22, 2016

Taleb v DPP: claiming an interest in restrained property pursuant to a loan agreement (19 June 2014)

Christian Juebner June 19, 2014

Markovski v DPP: meaning of lawfully acquired (22 March 2014)

Christian Juebner March 22, 2014

DPP v Judith Moran (Court of Appeal): used in or in connection with murder (24 July 2012)

Christian Juebner July 24, 2012

Chalmers v R: used in or in connection with offence of murder (13 March 2012)

Christian Juebner March 12, 2012

Queen Street Chambers,
Level 7, 221 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000

Linkedin Envelope

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

Resources
  • About
  • FAQs
  • News & Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • About
  • FAQs
  • News & Media
  • Resources
  • Contact

Website by Get You Known © 2024 Confiscation Law

  • About
  • FAQs
  • News & Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • About
  • FAQs
  • News & Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms